ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Two decades of resistance surveillance by the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy: design, development, delivery, deficiencies and future directions.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Resistance Surveillance Project: methods and limitations.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Applications and benefits of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Resistance Surveillance Project-legacy and future.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Antimicrobial Surveillance Project was established in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland in response to dissatisfaction with existing antimicrobial surveillance which, in the 1990s, was fragmented and poorly informative for clinical and public heath purposes. The model developed into an integrated Project that was novel in its management and financing, being a true collaboration between a medical charity, pharmaceutical companies and the laboratories contracted to perform the testing. Separate 'Programmes' within an overall 'Project' collected and tested community- and hospital-acquired respiratory and bloodstream infection isolates. Cooperation with public sector bodies allowed data collection from the Project to be compared to routinely collected data from National Health Service laboratories. Between 1999 and 2019 the Project delivered test results on almost 100 000 isolates, from 17 bacterial genera to 44 antimicrobial agents. The results were made available annually on a specially constructed web site. In this supplement, we summarize the data collected in a series of papers relevant to the two programmes, discussing the Project's strengths and deficiencies. Support for the Project declined in the period after 2010, and collection ceased after 20 years, its demise related to changing priorities within the partner organizations. However, the bacterial collection remains and is to be maintained to assist in future work in combating antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.