Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140280›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2025

Engaging patient-led rare disease organizations to advance research - through the lens of Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

Timothy Ogden, Bendert de Graaf, Tonia Hymers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy OgdenBBS Foundation, PO Box 663 Unionville, PA 19375, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2404-7813
Bendert de GraafBardet Biedl Syndroom Stichting, Keulvoet 12, 8266KK Kampen, The Netherlands.
Tonia HymersBBS UK, 43 Balton Way, Dovercourt, Harwich, Essex, CO12 4UP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For researchers and clinician-scientists, forging partnerships with patient-led rare disease organizations can be a challenge. Patient-led rare disease organizations often operate quite differently to research and medical institutions, large private or public funding organizations, and pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies, leaving researchers and clinician-scientists uncertain about how, when and where to engage for mutual benefit. However, the value of reciprocal engagement can be immense, paying dividends in new research directions, accelerating existing research, facilitating access to funding and achieving success in translation. Most importantly, it can improve the lives of individuals with disease. In this Perspective, we will explore the value of engaging and collaborating with patient-led rare disease organizations through the lens of a rare syndromic ciliopathy - Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) - for which patient-led organizations exist in multiple countries. We explain what researchers should know about how rare disease organizations operate, discuss examples of successful engagement between researchers, clinician-scientists and patient-led organizations, and review the 'do's and don't's' of successful collaboration.

Indexed as

Bardet-Biedl SyndromeBiomedical ResearchRare DiseasesHumansBardet–Biedl syndromeCiliopathiesCollaborationPatient-led rare disease organizationRare genetic diseases

Identifiers

PMID41140280
PMCPMC12633727

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.