Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140578›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2025

Cultivar selection and processing methods are crucial tools for tailoring the physico-chemical properties and functionality of pea (

Jason D Foley, Tomasz P Czaja, Maria M Rieckmann, Malbor Dervishi, Søren B Engelsen, Kristian H Laursen, Andrea Bononad-Olmo, Wender L P Bredie, Vibeke Orlien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jason D FoleyDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Tomasz P CzajaDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Maria M RieckmannDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Malbor DervishiDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Søren B EngelsenDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Kristian H LaursenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Andrea Bononad-OlmoDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Wender L P BredieDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Vibeke OrlienDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ten cultivars of pea (Akooma, Astronaute, Bagoo, Greenway, Ingrid, Kaplan, Karacter, Manager, Orchestra, and Skol) were grown to advance the understanding of the functional diversity, sensory quality, and applicability of pea proteins. The pea seeds were processed into two protein-rich ingredients: concentrates (mean protein content of 48.3 %) by dry-fractionation and isolates by wet extraction (mean protein content of 80 %). The isolates were characterized by denatured protein particles and high natural pH (6.7-8.2) compared to the concentrates containing native protein and lower natural pH (5.4-5.9), including other constituents such as saponins and fibers. The differences in compositional characteristics did not affect physico-chemical characteristics, but greatly impacted ingredients' techno-functional properties, and in turn their food applicability. Water and oil holding capacities were higher in the isolates, 7.54 g water/g powder and 3.54 g oil/g powder, compared to concentrates, 2.16 g water/g powder and 1.63 g oil/g powder, highlighting important differences in the ingredient interaction with water and oil. In contrast, the concentrates exhibited higher protein solubility, up to 65 % in neutral and up to 81 % in alkaline systems, outperforming the isolates with protein solubilities near 15 %. A higher foaming ability of concentrates (40-70 %) in comparison to isolates (30-60 %) was found at their natural pH. Smaller particle size enhanced foam forming ability of concentrates, while the aggregates in isolates may interfere with the foam formation mechanism. Concentrates were perceived as sweet, umami, bitter, and astringency tasting. The flavors, green pea, yellow pea, nutty, and bitter after taste, differed significantly between the different cultivars.

Indexed as

ConcentrateFoamabilityIsolatePea proteinpH effectsPhysico-chemical characteristics

Identifiers

PMID41140578
PMCPMC12553074

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.