ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder based on eye tracking technology using deep learning models.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-supported therapeutic interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Participant-Independent Classification of Autism-Related Visual Attention Patterns from Eye-Tracking Scanpath Images Using a Global-Local Fusion Network.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Graph Neural Networks and sequential architectures for autism detection from eye-tracking biomarkers: a multi-site study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often find it difficult to maintain eye contact, which is vital for social communication. Eye tracking (ET) technology helps determine how long children with ASD focus on someone, how frequently they do so, and in which direction their gaze moves. ET provides insights into social attention by enabling precise, real-time tracking of gaze patterns as individuals process social information visually. It is a dependable method for identifying and developing social attentional biomarkers, particularly in challenging conditions like ASD. Objective: This study aims to implement deep learning (DL) algorithms using eye-tracking data from social attention tasks involving children with ASD. Methods: The approach was tested using standard datasets collected from individuals with and without ASD through eye-tracking technology. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models were used to analyze data from children with ASD. Data preprocessing techniques addressed missing data and converted categorical features into numerical values. Mutual information-based feature selection was employed to reduce the feature set by identifying the most relevant features, thereby improving system performance. These features were then analyzed using LSTM and CNN-LSTM models to evaluate their potential for diagnosing ASD. Results: The experimental results showed that the highest accuracy achieved was 99.78% with the CNN-LSTM model. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the proposed method outperformed previous studies. Conclusion: The system successfully diagnosed ASD using the ET dataset. This approach shows promise for clinical application, assisting healthcare professionals in diagnosing ASD more accurately through advanced artificial intelligence technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.