SynthesisFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Scoping review to assess the reach, effectiveness, and impact of government-funded, population-based physical activity initiatives in Australian adults.
Synthesis in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Scoping review to assess the reach, effectiveness, and impact of government-funded, population-based physical activity initiatives in Australian adults.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In Australia, physical activity initiatives are often implemented by state and federal governments to enhance population-wide physical activity levels. Given the complexity and variability of government-funded physical activity programs, a scoping review is needed to synthesise the existing evidence and identify gaps in current initiatives. The aim of this review is to explore the reach, effectiveness, and impact of government-funded, population-based physical activity initiatives targeting Australian adults. Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and ProQuest Public Health were searched for articles published between January 2000 and April 2024. Search terms included relevant terms surrounding the main topics of "physical activity," "intervention," "population-based," "government-funded," and "Australia." Grey literature was collected from the websites of relevant organisations, health agencies of Australian states and territories, and other government departments. In addition, a manual search of references listed in primary sources was conducted to find journal articles missed during the database search. A narrative synthesis of included studies was conducted. Results: In total, 6,127 sources were identified, of which 71 were included in the final review. The peer-reviewed studies and grey literature evaluation reports identified physical activity initiatives across all Australian states and at the national level. Queensland and Victoria reported a greater number of physical activity interventions, strategies, and action plans compared to other states. The most common intervention strategies involved the use of digital platforms and a combination of multiple strategies. Discussion: While most of these initiatives increased physical activity, their overall reach to the broader Australian population was limited. The initiatives positively impacted individuals' health (e.g., weight, mitigating chronic diseases) and well-being (e.g., developing social connections). Although these initiatives have demonstrated improvements in physical activity and community health and well-being, they have only reached a small fraction of the Australian population. This review highlights the need for a National Physical Activity Plan. While many states have published high-quality strategies and action plans, there is a pressing need for their actual implementation to assess effectiveness. Future research should focus on standardising evaluation frameworks and exploring strategies to enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of initiatives, particularly in diverse populations. Systematic Review Registration: https://osf.io/6aev4/registrations, identifier 6aev4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.