ReviewCureus2025
Impact of Leg Compression on Arterial and Skin Blood Flow: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leg compression is used clinically to treat edema, lymphedema, and vascular disorders, but its effects on arterial and skin blood flow remain incompletely defined. This review evaluated hemodynamic responses to different compression modalities. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science identified 443 articles. After screening and appraisal, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 33 reported quantitative changes in leg arterial blood flow (LBF) and 11 reported changes in skin blood flow (SBF). Across the LBF studies, 28 (85%) found an increase, four (12%) reported a decrease, and one (3%) showed mixed results. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and stockings produced the most consistent increases, particularly when applied during activity or over longer durations, while excessive static or high-pressure compression occasionally reduced flow. An increase of 29% to over 300% was reported, with improvements observed in both healthy individuals and patients with peripheral arterial disease, critical limb ischemia, or intermittent claudication. For SBF, eight studies (73%) showed an increase, two (18%) showed a decrease, and one (9%) demonstrated mixed findings. IPC consistently augmented SBF, often by >90%, with combined foot and calf compression producing the largest gains. In contrast, excessive external pressure reduced perfusion, highlighting the importance of the compression level. Bandaging improved SBF in venous ulcer patients but reduced it in healthy controls at high pressures. Overall, compression therapy most often increased LBF and SBF, though effects varied with modality, applied pressure, and patient population. These findings emphasize the need for modality- and dose-specific application when using compression to enhance lower extremity perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.