Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141067›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Impact of Leg Compression on Arterial and Skin Blood Flow: A Scoping Review.

Quintin Norris, Christopher Ephron, Jeremy Shore, Peter Akel, Deven Khanna, Harvey N Mayrovitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Quintin NorrisOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.
Christopher EphronOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.
Jeremy ShoreOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Peter AkelOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.
Deven KhannaOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.
Harvey N MayrovitzMedical Education, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leg compression is used clinically to treat edema, lymphedema, and vascular disorders, but its effects on arterial and skin blood flow remain incompletely defined. This review evaluated hemodynamic responses to different compression modalities. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science identified 443 articles. After screening and appraisal, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 33 reported quantitative changes in leg arterial blood flow (LBF) and 11 reported changes in skin blood flow (SBF). Across the LBF studies, 28 (85%) found an increase, four (12%) reported a decrease, and one (3%) showed mixed results. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and stockings produced the most consistent increases, particularly when applied during activity or over longer durations, while excessive static or high-pressure compression occasionally reduced flow. An increase of 29% to over 300% was reported, with improvements observed in both healthy individuals and patients with peripheral arterial disease, critical limb ischemia, or intermittent claudication. For SBF, eight studies (73%) showed an increase, two (18%) showed a decrease, and one (9%) demonstrated mixed findings. IPC consistently augmented SBF, often by >90%, with combined foot and calf compression producing the largest gains. In contrast, excessive external pressure reduced perfusion, highlighting the importance of the compression level. Bandaging improved SBF in venous ulcer patients but reduced it in healthy controls at high pressures. Overall, compression therapy most often increased LBF and SBF, though effects varied with modality, applied pressure, and patient population. These findings emphasize the need for modality- and dose-specific application when using compression to enhance lower extremity perfusion.

Indexed as

circulationhemodynamicsintermittent pneumatic compressionischemialeg ulcersperfusionperipheral arterial diseasepulsatility

Identifiers

PMID41141067
PMCPMC12547643

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.