ArticleCureus2025
Thrombolytic Therapy for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in a Non-percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Capable Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are common life-threatening emergencies encountered in clinical practice. Options for reperfusion therapy are often unavailable in resource-limited settings like Ghana. We present a review of our 19-month experience with systemic thrombolysis for patients with STEMI and hemodynamically unstable PE in Tamale Teaching Hospital (TTH) in Tamale, Ghana. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥ 18 years old with acute STEMI and PE managed in TTH from January 2023 to July 2024. STEMI was defined using standard criteria. Systemic thrombolysis was administered to eligible STEMI patients presenting within 12 hours of symptom onset. Hemodynamically unstable PE was defined as persistent hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for longer than 15 minutes), obstructive shock, or the need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We assessed treatment timelines, complications, and in-hospital outcomes. Results Of 42 patients with a mean age (± SD) of 56.6 ± 16.7 years with STEMI, 25 (59.5%) were male. Seven (16.7%) patients received systemic thrombolysis as the primary reperfusion strategy. For patients with STEMI, the median delay from symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC) was 10 hours (IQR 3.0-42.0), whilst the delay from FMC to thrombolysis was four hours (IQR 2-5 hours). Seventy-six patients with a mean age of 53.0 ± 18.1 years had confirmed pulmonary embolism, of which 35 (46.1%) were male. Systemic thrombolysis was administered to five hemodynamically unstable patients. Cost considerations largely determined the choice of thrombolytic agent used. Adverse events following thrombolysis included four cases of allergic reactions (all with streptokinase), two patients with minor bleeding involving skin puncture sites, and one patient with bleeding from the urethral meatus. Conclusion Reperfusion therapy for STEMI and PE remains challenging in resource-limited settings like Ghana. Systemic thrombolysis is feasible but is limited by systemic challenges, including the high cost of fibrin-specific thrombolytic agents and late presentation. Strategies to promote early presentation and timely thrombolysis, such as community education, access to timely electrocardiogram interpretation, and sustainable financing models, are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.