ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Developing a Health Literacy Intervention for Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: A Timing It Right Framework.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a health literacy intervention program for patients with hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis based on Timing It Right. Methods: Guided by the Timing It Right framework, a preliminary version of the intervention program was developed through a comprehensive literature review and semi-structured interviews. From August to October 2023, two rounds of Delphi expert consultations were carried out with a panel of 15 medical and nursing experts from four provinces and municipalities (Jiangsu, Sichuan, Heilongjiang, and Shanghai). The feedback obtained through this process was used to refine and finalize the intervention program. Results: Following two rounds of consultation, a consensus was reached among all 15 experts. The authority coefficients of the experts were 0.825 and 0.813, respectively, with a 100% response rate. The Kendall's coefficients of concordance were 0.203 and 0.206 (P < 0.001). In the second round, the coefficients of variation for all items ranged from 0.071 to 0.188. The final health literacy intervention program comprised 4 first-level items, 10 second-level items, and 52 third-level items. Conclusion: The health literacy intervention program developed using the Timing It Right framework demonstrates scientific validity, reliability, feasibility, and practical applicability. It effectively addresses the clinical needs of patients and offers structured guidance for enhancing their health literacy. Further clinical validation is warranted to confirm its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.