ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2025
Towards the clinical use of peripheral bile acids: Recommendations to limit their preanalytical and analytical sources of variability.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic, enterohepatic and gut microbial effects of atorvastatin in healthy men.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- The gut microbiota-bile acid-FXR axis in NAFLD: from progression to therapeutic applications.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Bile Acids as Key Mediators of the Gut Microbiota-Immune Axis: Potential Biomarker and Therapeutic Perspectives.BioFactors (Oxford, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite more than three decades of research, the use of peripheral bile acids as biomarkers for human liver injury remains inconclusive due to inconsistent findings. Identifying the factors contributing to the variability in published peripheral bile acid data in humans is needed to propose experimental recommendations that could enhance the robustness and reproducibility of future studies. Besides the peripheral blood bile acid data, the metadata on subject demographics (number of subjects, average age, sex distribution, health status, fasted/fed status), the blood matrix analyzed, the matrix volume analyzed, the bile acid extraction process, and analytical technique were extracted from 65 studies involving 215 patient cohorts. Bile acid concentrations in normal cohorts were found to exhibit large inter-study variability. The analytical technique used to measure bile acid concentrations, the fasted/fed status of patients at the time of sampling, the choice of blood collection matrix, the starting volume of this matrix, and the choice of protein precipitation solvent were found to be determinants of this variability. To address these determinants, procedural recommendations are proposed: liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry should be used to measure absolute bile acid concentrations in 50
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.