ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Family and peer influences on adolescent psychological inflexibility: a regression mixture analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of family functioning and peer pressure on nicotine dependence: a cross-sectional study among medical students in South Punjab, Pakistan.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Adolescent's views of positive and negative influences of family on wellbeing.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adolescent mental health problems are closely linked to psychological inflexibility. Prior research has identified separate effects of family functioning and peer relationships on psychological inflexibility, but their combined effects (particularly from a person-centered perspective) remain underexplored. We use a person-centered regression mixture approach to jointly model family functioning and peer relationships and examine their joint associations with adolescent psychological inflexibility. Methods: The study surveyed 940 adolescents using the Family APGAR Index, the Peer Relationship Scale, and the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth to measure family functioning, peer relationships, and psychological inflexibility, respectively. Results: Through latent class analysis (LCA), six latent classes representing combined patterns of family functioning and peer relationships were identified. Adolescents exposed to both low family functioning and low peer relationships showed the highest psychological inflexibility, whereas those with high family functioning and high peer relationships showed the lowest. Regression mixture results indicated significant differences in psychological inflexibility across classes. Conclusion: These findings highlight the joint influence of family functioning and peer relationships on adolescent psychological inflexibility and suggest that interventions should concurrently target both environments to reduce inflexibility and improve mental health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.