ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Rethinking routine lumbar puncture in isolated optic neuritis: results from a large cohort study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optic chiasmal neuritis: clinical features, aetiologies, MRI patterns and prognosis in a real-world cohort.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLumbar puncture (LP) remains widely recommended in the diagnostic evaluation of isolated optic neuritis (ON), when brain MRI does not reveal lesions suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the true clinical utility is unclear in the era of advanced serological and imaging diagnostics.
methodsIn this monocentric retrospective study of all consecutive adult patients with acute or subacute ON and no MS-like lesions on initial brain MRI, we analyzed the final etiological diagnoses, the specific contribution of LP, and treatment timing.
resultsAmong 184 patients, diagnoses at the end of the follow-up (median 15.3 months) included idiopathic ON (48.4%), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG associated disease (MOGAD; 22.3%), MS (19.6%), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (4.3%), sarcoidosis (4.3%), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia-related ON (CLL; 1.1%). LP contributed to the final diagnosis in only 4 cases (2,2%), including 2 MOGAD (MOG-IgG only in cerebrospinal fluid) and 2 chronic lymphocytic leukemia-related ON, always in conjunction with other tests and clinical context. Conversely, spinal or orbital MRI and antibody testing were key diagnostic tools. Median delay between MRI and LP was 3 days, contributing to a median 11-day interval from symptom onset to corticosteroid treatment initiation.
conclusionsRoutine LP has minimal diagnostic yield in isolated ON without MS-typical MRI findings and may delay treatment. Our results support a more selective, context-driven diagnostic strategy prioritizing MRI and antibody testing over systematic LP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144049What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.