ArticlePloS one2025
Safety evaluation of cinacalcet: Signal mining and analysis of adverse events based on the FAERS database.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study utilized the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess signals of adverse events (AEs) associated with cinacalcet, aiming to enhance its safe and rational clinical application.
methodsAdverse event reports related to cinacalcet were extracted from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2025. The AE reports were categorized by Preferred Terms (PTs) and System Organ Classes (SOCs), and risk signals were analyzed using disproportionality analysis.
resultsAmong 30,540 AE reports where cinacalcet was the primary suspect drug, females exhibited a higher reporting frequency than males (47.30% vs. 39.80%). The highest proportion of reports was observed in the 60-74 age group (23.85%). Most AEs predominantly occurred within <7 days (11.14%) or ≥60 days (26.35%) of drug administration. A total of 78 significant PT signals were detected, including known AEs such as nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, abdominal discomfort, hypocalcemia and epigastric pain, aligning with the drug's prescribing information. Additionally, several AEs previously undocumented in the drug's specifications were observed, including precocious puberty, parathyroid hemorrhage, hypoproteinemia, pancreatic atrophy, monocytopenia, cardiac death and arrhythmia.
conclusionPatient evaluation should be conducted prior to the clinical use of cinacalcet, particularly for individuals with heart failure, hepatic or renal insufficiency, and hypocalcemia. Close monitoring of electrolytes and vigilance for gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and endocrine-related AEs are recommended. Prompt interventions should be implemented in cases of adverse reactions or disease progression to prevent serious complications or deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.