Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144834›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Childbearing in women diagnosed with cancer during reproductive age.

Giovanna Esposito, Anna Cantarutti, Matteo Franchi, Fedro Alessandro Peccatori, Giovanna Scarfone, Eva Negri, Giovanni Corrao, Fabio Parazzini, Carlo La Vecchia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Subsequent pregnancies after a diagnosis of pregnancy-associated cancer.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  2. Childbearing in women diagnosed with cancer during reproductive age.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giovanna EspositoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7894-4456
Anna CantaruttiUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Matteo FranchiUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Fedro Alessandro PeccatoriDepartment of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna ScarfoneObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Eva NegriDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni CorraoEmeritus Professor of Medical Statistics, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Fabio ParazziniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Carlo La VecchiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1441-897X

Funding

Next Generation EU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFertility after cancer represents a growing clinical concern. This study assessed childbearing outcomes among women diagnosed with cancer during reproductive age between 2012 and 2017 in Lombardy, the largest region in Italy. MATERIAL AND

methodsWomen aged 15-45 years with a primary diagnosis of cancer recorded in hospital discharge records from regional healthcare databases were selected. Each woman diagnosed with cancer was matched with up to five cancer-free women of the same age at diagnosis. The cumulative probability of childbirth up to December 31, 2022 was estimated using the Kalbfleisch-Prentice cumulative incidence function estimator. Cox regression models were used to estimate the cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of childbirth according to the cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, in the group of cancer survivors, exposure to antineoplastic treatment was considered and included in the model as a time-dependent covariate. Finally, a log-binomial regression model was used to assess the association between antineoplastic therapy and medically assisted reproduction.

resultsA total of 13,877 women were diagnosed with cancer at reproductive age during the study period (1.16 per 1000 person-years). The cumulative probability of childbirth was lower among women diagnosed with cancer compared to cancer-free women across all age groups: 31.4% vs 32.2% (p = 0.02) among those diagnosed under 30, 13.3% vs 22.7% (p < 0.01) among those aged 30-39, and 0.8% vs 1.6% (p < 0.01) among those aged 40 and over. The corresponding HRs were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.05), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.53-0.64), and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.40-0.68). When analyses were stratified by time since diagnosis, the reduced probability among cancer survivors was confirmed to be significant only within the first 5 years after diagnosis, also for younger individuals. Antineoplastic treatment was associated with a reduced probability of subsequent birth (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.39-0.52). Moreover, the therapy was positively associated with medically assisted reproduction (RR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.14-2.56).

conclusionsThe probability of childbearing was reduced within the first 5 years of diagnosis, regardless of the patient's age. A more pronounced reduction was observed in women diagnosed after the age of 30. Age and antineoplastic therapy were key factors in determining childbearing in women diagnosed with cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansItalyMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung Adultcancerchildbearingfertility preservationoncofertilityreproductive age

Identifiers

PMID41144834
PMCPMC12668817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.