ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2026
Development of an Explainable Machine Learning Model to Predict Mortality Risk in Sepsis Patients: Insights From a Real-World Clinical Data.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening dysregulated host response to infection; early risk stratification is essential to guide intensive care.
objectiveTo develop and interpret a machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data from sepsis patients admitted to the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Missing values were imputed using the mice package, and class imbalance was addressed with the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique. Seven models-Random Forest (RF), k -Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, logistic regression, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-logistic regression, and light gradient boosting machine-were trained and evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision-recall curves, and decision curve analysis. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were applied for global and local interpretation.
resultsRF achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.9816) and provided the highest net clinical benefit. SHAP identified key prognostic variables and illustrated patient-specific risk contributions.
conclusionsAn RF-based, SHAP-interpretable model offers accurate and explainable mortality risk prediction for septic ICU patients, supporting individualized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.