Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145259›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Factors influencing physician-to-physician teleconsultation: a scoping review.

Samane Ghasemi, Tahereh Changiz, Athar Omid

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samane GhasemiMedical Education Research Center, Department of Medical Education, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Tahereh ChangizMedical Education Research Center, Department of Medical Education, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Athar OmidMedical Education Research Center, Department of Medical Education, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran athar.omid@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-0351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeleconsultation has gained significant traction due to advancements in information and communication technologies. While much attention has been given to physician-to-patient teleconsultation, the factors influencing physician-to-physician teleconsultation remain underexplored.

objectivesThis scoping review aims to map and synthesise the existing evidence on the factors influencing physician-to-physician teleconsultation. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included publications of all methodological designs that specifically addressed factors affecting physician-to-physician teleconsultation. Studies focusing primarily on physician-to-patient teleconsultation without sufficient detail on physician-to-physician components were excluded. The search was limited to articles published in English and Persian between 2014 and 2024. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Eight electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, etc) were searched from January 2014 to June 2024. CHARTING

methodsData extraction was performed by two independent reviewers using a standardised form. Extracted data included study characteristics, key factors influencing teleconsultation and main findings.

resultsFrom 12 included studies, five key influencing components were identified: 'patient-related factors', 'medical team competencies', 'infrastructure and technology', 'timing factors' and 'planning and programme evaluation'. Among these, infrastructure and technology were the most frequently reported factors across the studies, while patient-related factors were less commonly addressed.

conclusionsThis review identifies a comprehensive set of factors that influence physician-to-physician teleconsultation. The findings provide a foundation for developing effective teleconsultation programmes and highlight the need for more research in diverse healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansRemote ConsultationHumansMedicinePhysiciansTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41145259
PMCPMC12570956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.