ArticleBMJ open2025
Factors influencing physician-to-physician teleconsultation: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTeleconsultation has gained significant traction due to advancements in information and communication technologies. While much attention has been given to physician-to-patient teleconsultation, the factors influencing physician-to-physician teleconsultation remain underexplored.
objectivesThis scoping review aims to map and synthesise the existing evidence on the factors influencing physician-to-physician teleconsultation. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included publications of all methodological designs that specifically addressed factors affecting physician-to-physician teleconsultation. Studies focusing primarily on physician-to-patient teleconsultation without sufficient detail on physician-to-physician components were excluded. The search was limited to articles published in English and Persian between 2014 and 2024. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Eight electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, etc) were searched from January 2014 to June 2024. CHARTING
methodsData extraction was performed by two independent reviewers using a standardised form. Extracted data included study characteristics, key factors influencing teleconsultation and main findings.
resultsFrom 12 included studies, five key influencing components were identified: 'patient-related factors', 'medical team competencies', 'infrastructure and technology', 'timing factors' and 'planning and programme evaluation'. Among these, infrastructure and technology were the most frequently reported factors across the studies, while patient-related factors were less commonly addressed.
conclusionsThis review identifies a comprehensive set of factors that influence physician-to-physician teleconsultation. The findings provide a foundation for developing effective teleconsultation programmes and highlight the need for more research in diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.