Evidence mapPaperPMID 41145337Full record

ReviewThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025

Alzheimer Combination Therapies: Overview and Scenarios.

Jeffrey L Cummings, Aaron H Burstein, Howard Fillit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advances in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. The roles of biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeffrey L CummingsChambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, NV, USA. Electronic address: jcummings@cnsinnovations.com.
Aaron H BursteinAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Howard FillitAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Risk and Resilience, Clinical presentation, and Biomarker Profiles of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy and Related Dementias: The DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project IIR01NS139383 · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · 2025 to 2025
$3.0M
Renewal of Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) (Phase 2) CNTN - ResubmissionP20GM109025 · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · 2025 to 2025
$1.0M
Alzheimer's Clinical Trial InnOvatioN (ACTION) InitiativeR35AG071476 · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · 2025 to 2025
$560k
Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Innovation Incubator (InnovaTor)R25AG083721 · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · 2025 to 2025
$255k
NIA NIH HHS R25 AG083721NIA NIH HHS R35 AG071476NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109025NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS139383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in understanding the complexity of Alzheimer's disease informs the search for combination therapies that can successfully prevent or substantially slow the progression of the disease. Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies are the first approved disease targeted therapies; they slow disease progression by approximately 30 %. Building on these agents in add-on therapies is one avenue to designing combination treatments. Development of combination drugs consisting of two or more novel interventions is an alternate pathway for combination treatment development. Combination therapies can involve small molecule drugs, biological agents, devices, stem cells, gene therapies, lifestyle interventions, or cognitive training. Nonclinical assessment of drug combinations may involve animal models or new approach methodologies such as induced pluripotent stem cells or organoids. Phase 1 trials are required to characterize each member of a novel combination. Phase 2 trials may use a 2-by-2 factorial design comparing each drug to placebo and the drug combination. In Phase 3, comparison of the novel combination to standard of care may be sufficient or more complex designs may be required. Targets for combination therapies beyond amyloid-related processes include tau abnormalities, inflammation, neurodegeneration, and co-pathologies such as alpha-synuclein and TDP-43. The choice of combination therapies will depend on the strength of the information regarding the target, biomarkers to guide clinical trials, and a candidate agent with the appropriate mechanism of action. Computational strategies based on network analysis of disease and drugs, validation in non-clinical models, and use of real-world data may facilitate prioritization of candidates for combination treatments.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansAlzheimer's diseaseCombination therapyCo-pathologyInflammationMonoclonal antibodiesSynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41145337
PMCPMC12627886

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.