ReviewThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Add-on combination therapy with monoclonal antibodies: Implications for drug development.
Review in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operationalizing Alzheimer's disease trials in the era of targeted therapies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Harnessing combination therapy: Current treatments, recent advancements, and future directions in Alzheimer's disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (MABs) including aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab have been approved by the FDA and lecanemab and donanemab are available in the US market and a variety of other national markets. The increasing use of anti-amyloid MABs to treat early AD will require that development of novel agents occur as add-on treatment to MABs. There is limited experience with add-on therapy to anti-amyloid agents. In most cases, it is prudent to initiate novel agents after at least six-months exposure to the MAB at the highest dose. Agents with extensive data on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and well-known safety may employ alternative approaches. Anti-amyloid MABs have different mechanisms of action, titration, and side effect profiles suggesting that add-on trials include only one type of MAB if possible. Demonstration of clinical benefit with add-on therapy will require showing additional slowing beyond that provided by the anti-amyloid MAB. Anti-amyloid therapies have profound effects on biomarkers including amyloid positron emission tomography and plasma p-tau and plasma GFAP measures. Definition of the biomarker profile of a novel agent prior to initiation of add-on therapies, inclusion of target engagement biomarkers specific to the novel intervention, assessment of biomarkers not known to be affected by anti-amyloid MABs, and interrogation of the magnitude, timing, and trajectory of biomarker change in the add-on context compared to monotherapy with MABs will provide insight into the biological impact of the novel therapy on AD. Patient convenience in terms of formulation and timing of add-on therapies will be important to successful clinical implementation. Add-on therapies are an important step in addressing the complexity of AD and optimizing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.