Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145713›Full record

SynthesisHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026

Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hsu Myat Noe, Alisara Sangviroon Sujarit, Bunchai Chongmelaxme, Sarinya Puwanant, Franco Wing Tak Cheng, Watsit Chaipatiwat, Anchana Pongpun, Yotsaya Kunlamas

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hsu Myat NoeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0005-3403-4975
Alisara Sangviroon SujaritDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0000-6297-8782
Bunchai ChongmelaxmeDepartment of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7750-6961
Sarinya PuwanantDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7090-9947
Franco Wing Tak ChengCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7818-1575
Watsit ChaipatiwatDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Huachiew Chalermprakiet University, Samut Prakan, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0007-9969-9331
Anchana PongpunDivision of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0005-8721-9025
Yotsaya KunlamasDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. yotsaya.k@pharm.chula.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0003-4127-1213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial evidence demonstrating that angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (Sacubitril/Valsartan - Sac/Val) significantly reduce sitting blood pressure (BP). However, comprehensive pooled analyses evaluating their effects on out-of-office BP in patients with systemic hypertension remain limited. We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized and non-randomized studies comparing Sac/Val with other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of systemic hypertension, from inception to the end of May 2024. Outcomes included nighttime, daytime and 24-h mean ambulatory (ma) systolic/diastolic BP (maSBP/maDBP), ambulatory pulse pressure (PP), and office BP. Safety outcomes were also assessed. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 observational studies representing 7548 patients were included. In RCTs, Sac/Val therapy was associated with greater reductions in out-of-office blood pressure compared to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). This included nighttime maSBP (mean difference [MD] -3.61 mmHg; 95% confidence intervals [CI] -4.86 to -2.36; p < 0.001) and maDBP (-2.11 mmHg; [-2.69 to -1.53]; p < 0.001); as well as daytime maSBP (-3.39 mmHg; [-4.58 to -2.21]; p < 0.001) and maDBP (-1.82 mmHg; [-2.82 to -0.82]; p < 0.001). Similarly, significant reductions in 24-h maSBP/maDBP, ambulatory PP, and office BP were observed with Sac/Val. Observational studies also demonstrated that Sac/Val significantly reduced office BP compared with ARBs and thiazide diuretics (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between groups. In conclusion, Sac/Val effectively reduces both out-of-office and office BP and is well tolerated throughout the follow-up period.

Indexed as

AminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsHypertensionNeprilysinBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureDrug CombinationsHumansValsartanAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsNeprilysinsacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationValsartanAngiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitorARNIBlood pressureHypertensionSacubitril/Valsartan

Identifiers

PMID41145713

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.