ReviewDermatology and therapy2025
Biologic Therapies and Major Cardiovascular Events in Psoriasis: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of the Effects and Safety of Planned Limited-Time Withdrawal Versus Continuous Maintenance of Interleukin Inhibitors in Patients with Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiovascular Risk in Psoriatic Arthritis: Mechanisms, Risk Assessment, and Long-Term Management Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Tildrakizumab in a Large Spanish Multicenter Cohort from Spanish Psoriasis Group (GPS).Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Dynamics of Blood-Count-Derived Inflammatory Indices in the Course of Systemic Treatment for Psoriasis: A Single Center Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular disease is a leading co-morbidity in psoriasis patients. The cutaneous benefits of biologic therapies for severe plaque psoriasis are well-established, but the impact of biologics on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in psoriatic patients requires further elucidation. This study aimed to investigate the impact of biologic therapies on the risk of MACE in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on 10 May 2022, using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and EMBASE databases for relevant studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology was applied, and all studies were critically appraised. All studies selected for inclusion were randomised control trials (RCTs) that contained data on MACE and compared licensed biologic therapies with placebo or other biologics in adults with moderate-severe plaque psoriasis.
resultsThe search of the databases revealed 36 papers (reporting on 43 RCTs) which met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference in the risk for MACE between biologic therapies and placebo was found [Peto odds ratio (POR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-3.01, P = 0.59]. A comparison of specific types of biologics also revealed no significant effect in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept) (POR 1.13, 95% CI 0.29-4.32 P = 0.86), interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, bimekizumab) (POR 0.60, 95% CI 0.16-2.25, P = 0.45); IL 12/23 inhibitors (usetekinumab) (POR 3.80, 95% CI 0.37-39.44, P = 0.26) and IL-23 (guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab) (POR 1.75, 95% CI 0.25-12.43 P = 0.58).
conclusionsAnti-psoriatic biologics were not associated with an increased risk of MACE in psoriasis patients. Given that most included RCTs were of relatively short duration, longer-term studies and post-marketing surveillance are needed to clarify the cardiovascular safety profile of biologic therapies. Further large-scale studies with extended follow-up are warranted. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (identification number CRD42022325792).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.