SynthesisPharmaceutical research2025
Spotlight on Clinical In-Use Parameters for Intravenous Infusion of Therapeutic Antibodies: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Amino Acid Excipients on icIEF Method Development in Protein Therapeutics: A Formulation-Aware Analytical Framework.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Particle Design for High-Concentration Protein Suspension Injectables.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous (IV) administration of therapeutic antibodies requires multiple in-use steps to ensure safety, purity and potency before patient administration. This review systematically examines 93 FDA-approved therapeutic antibodies administered via IV infusion, focusing on critical clinical in-use parameters reported in their prescribing information. Key parameters analyzed include storage conditions, drug concentrations, dosing regimens, dilution and diluents, infusion rates, priming and flushing procedures, needle and syringe specifications, IV bag and line materials, infusion filters, pumps, and venous access devices. The statistical analysis of these parameters highlights the most commonly used industry practices, providing a comprehensive reference for formulation scientists designing clinical in-use studies or drafting pharmacy manuals for antibody-based products. Our findings show that saline is the most frequently recommended diluent, though some antibodies recommend alternative diluents such as dextrose solutions or lactated Ringer's solution. Similarly, filters are recommended for 65% of the analyzed drug products, yet variations exist in pore size and material recommendations. Additionally, oncology-related antibodies often require graduated infusion rates to mitigate infusion-related reactions, and 31% of antibodies suggest adjusting infusion rates based on patient tolerance. These findings highlight the need for systematic in-use studies covering various scenarios and clinical settings to establish evidence-based recommendations. Well-designed clinical in-use studies, coupled with well-structured pharmacy manuals that clearly outline in-use preparation steps, enhance clarity, reduce preparation errors, and improve workflow efficiency to ultimately ensure safe and effective IV administration of therapeutic antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145745What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.