Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145836›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2025

The neural circuits and signalling pathways of opioid use disorder.

Victor P Mathis, Aliza T Ehrlich, Emmanuel Darcq

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victor P MathisINSERM UMR-S1329, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience & Psychiatry, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3690-0970
Aliza T EhrlichDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. aliza.ehrlich@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-1100
Emmanuel DarcqINSERM UMR-S1329, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience & Psychiatry, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. edarcq@unistra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8377-8015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) represents an important global public health crisis, often referred to as the 'opioid epidemic'. Opioids are known for their potent pain-relieving effects, but also have serious side effects, including OUD and respiratory depression, which can lead to fatal overdoses. To address this growing concern, we require a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying OUD, which typically begins with either medical or recreational opioid use and evolves into a complex and chronic brain disorder. In this Review, we highlight recent advances in our understanding of opioid receptors and the neural circuits in which they operate (including the broad network of circuits involved in reward and relief processing), focusing on the changes that follow long-term opioid exposure, abstinence and withdrawal. Additionally, we discuss recent findings that highlight the importance of the local cellular environment in shaping responses to these drugs. Overall, we aim to provide an updated overview of the field that may give us new insights into the multifaceted landscape of OUD.

Indexed as

BrainNerve NetNeural PathwaysOpioid-Related DisordersSignal TransductionAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsHumansReceptors, OpioidAnalgesics, OpioidReceptors, Opioid

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.