SynthesisJournal of medical systems2025
The Impact of Different Mobile Health Technologies on Physical Activity of COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare and rank the effects of different mobile health (mHealth) technologies on the physical activity of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Eight databases from January 2010 to March 2025 were searched. Two researchers independently screened the studies and extracted the data. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Paired Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.1 software, and network Meta-analysis was performed using RStudio software. A total of 25 studies were included, involving 7 intervention measures, with a sample size of 2093 cases. The results showed that in the paired Meta-analysis, the combination of smart wearable devices and telephone support, as well as smart wearable devices alone, could improve the physical activity level of patients; the WeChat platform, App, and smart wearable devices could effectively improve the patients' exercise endurance. Surface under cumulative rank curve (SUCRA) ranking indicated that, compared with other mHealth technologies, the WeChat platform and the combination of telephone support and smart wearable devices were the top two optimal treatment measures. Current evidence shows that mHealth technologies can promote the physical activity of COPD patients and may improve their exercise endurance. When traditional pulmonary rehabilitation is not feasible, the use of mHealth technologies may be a better intervention option. More high-quality studies with large samples, multiple centers, and long-term follow-up are still needed to further verify this conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145878What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.