Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145895›Full record

ReviewJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025

Engaging Historically Excluded Women in Health Research: Addressing Intersectional Barriers to Advance Equitable Recruitment.

Jasmine Abrams, Idalis A Chestnut, Joanne Gaillard, Jaleah Rutledge, Tamora Callands, Tamara Nelson, Samantha E Parker, Christina D Yarrington

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jasmine AbramsSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. jasmine.abrams@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1464-9156
Idalis A ChestnutDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Joanne GaillardDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jaleah RutledgeSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tamora CallandsDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Tamara NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA.
Samantha E ParkerDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Christina D YarringtonDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

NHLBI Division of Intramural Research R01HL158864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiverse and inclusive patient recruitment in health research is essential for addressing health disparities and ensuring generalizability of findings. However, recruiting underrepresented populations remains a persistent challenge due to barriers such as language, cultural differences, sociohistorical factors, and technological limitations.

objectiveUtilizing an intersectional lens, this paper presents recruitment strategies and lessons learned from engaging a diverse, multilingual postpartum patient sample in qualitative health research. PRINCIPAL

findingsKey strategies to address intersectional barriers included the following: (1) Responding to Participant Needs, (2) Utilizing a Multilingual Research Team, (3) Ensuring Social Identity Congruence among Team and Participants, (4) Cultural Humility Training, (5) Engaging Advisory Board Collaboration, (6) Utilizing Provider-Facilitated Referrals, (7) Addressing Technological Barriers with Flexible Digital Platforms, and (8) Using Text Messaging for Outreach.

conclusionsBy applying an intersectional lens, this study expands upon existing recruitment approaches, offering a contextually relevant framework for advancing equitable participation in health research. Including those most impacted by health disparities in research is an ethical imperative, necessary for producing findings that reflect the experiences of historically marginalized communities and ensuring they are meaningfully represented in scientific inquiry.

Indexed as

InclusionParticipant recruitmentRecruitment strategiesWomen of color

Identifiers

PMID41145895

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.