SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
The role of SGLT 2 inhibitors in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finerenone in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Expanding the Role of Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on heart failure outcomes in patients with and without diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Cardio-Vasculo-Renal Benefits of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study from a Lower-Resource Tertiary Center.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Barriers to prescribing and insurance approval of SGLT2 inhibitors for heart failure: a mixed-methods study in Jordan.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated cardioprotective effects in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but their efficacy remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2015 and 2025. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Secondary outcomes included HHF alone, all-cause mortality, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire quality-of-life scores (KCCQ). Meta-analysis used a random-effects model, with RoB 2.0 and GRADE applied to assess bias and evidence certainty.
resultsNine RCTs involving over 20,000 patients were included. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or HHF (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76-0.90; p < 0.0001) and HHF alone (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.68-0.84). All-cause mortality was not significantly reduced (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85-1.01), though directionally favorable. KCCQ scores improved modestly (+ 1.8 points), indicating enhanced quality of life. GRADE certainty was high for HHF reduction, and moderate for mortality and KCCQ outcomes. No serious concerns were identified regarding publication bias or indirectness.
conclusionSGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduce heart failure hospitalizations and improve patient-reported outcomes in HFpEF, with a neutral but favorable trend for mortality. These findings support their integration into guideline-directed medical therapy for HFpEF and highlight their growing role across the heart failure spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.