Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146099›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Gatekeepers in primary care - a qualitative study on manual therapists' role in triaging patients with back and neck pain.

Iben Axén, Elias Schriwer, Jesper Hjertstrand, Eva Skillgate, Per J Palmgren, Andreas Eklund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iben AxénUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Solna, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden. iben.axen@ki.se.
Elias SchriwerDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska huset, Tomtebodavägen 18A, Solna, Stockholm, 171 65, Sweden.
Jesper HjertstrandUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Solna, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Eva SkillgateUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Solna, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Per J PalmgrenDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska huset, Tomtebodavägen 18A, Solna, Stockholm, 171 65, Sweden.
Andreas EklundUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Solna, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Sweden, almost 60% of patients seeking care at primary healthcare centers do so due to musculoskeletal disorders. These patients constitute a strain on the healthcare system. Manual therapists are experts in diagnosing patients with these conditions but are usually not part of healthcare centers in Sweden. Further, there is a significant societal problem with overuse of medications, injections, medical imaging, and unnecessary surgeries, so-called low-value care, for back and neck pain. We aimed to explore the current management of patients with back and neck pain in primary healthcare centers, staff's perceptions regarding the need for improvement, and incentives and concerns about having licensed chiropractors and naprapaths (manual therapists) triage these patients as part of the primary healthcare center team.

methodsIn this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured focus group interviews with 20 participants employed at three primary healthcare centers in the Stockholm region, chosen based on location, organization, and exposure to manual therapists. Participants were purposefully selected from different professions. Data were analyzed using inductive qualitative manifest and latent content analysis.

resultsThe current management of patients with back and neck pain was described in terms of long waiting times and patients' expectations of seeing a medical doctor and receiving imaging. Thus, there was room for improvement by reducing low-value care. Participants had limited knowledge about the competence of chiropractors and naprapaths and were concerned about the boundaries of professional identity. Decreased physician workload and more choices for patients were mentioned as incentives for manual therapists to take on a triaging role.

conclusionsStaff at three primary healthcare centers in the Stockholm area described the current management of patients with back and neck pain as navigating the expectations of patients and their overreliance on seeing their physician, not other caregivers, resulting in long waiting times. Alongside patients expecting imaging, these were incentives for chiropractors and naprapaths triaging these patients as an opportunity to improve care. A lack of knowledge about the competence of manual therapists was a concern, and assigning manual therapists to the primary healthcare team would necessitate a reconfiguration of the care process, potentially challenging the boundaries of professional identity.

Indexed as

Back PainNeck PainPrimary Health CareProfessional RoleTriageAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwedenChiropracticCommunity health centersEvidence-based practiceFocus groupsInterprofessional relationsLow back painManual therapyNeck painQualitative researchReconstructingScope of practice

Identifiers

PMID41146099
PMCPMC12560454

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.