ArticleBMC public health2025
Exploring breast cancer stigma among medical students in Egypt: a national multi-center cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human immunodeficiency virus knowledge and stigma among medical students in Egypt: a national cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Awareness level of cancer risk factors and warning signs among adults in Mansoura District, Egypt.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The development trajectory of self-advocacy in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy after breast cancer surgery and its predictors.Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) stigma remains an understudied barrier to early detection and quality care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Yet, there is a lack of studies that assessed BC stigma among medical students worldwide; a critical gap given their future roles as healthcare providers. This study aims to explore BC stigma among medical students in Egypt and identify its associated factors.
methodsA national multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted during the academic Year 2024-2025, involving a convenience sample of 2,576 medical students from eight medical faculties across Egypt's four main regions. Data were collected through an online questionnaire capturing socio-demographic characteristics, educational background, BC-related experiences, and knowledge of BC including students' primary sources of information on the subject, alongside the BC-adapted Cancer Stigma Scale (CASS) that assessed six domains: Severity, Financial Discrimination, Personal Responsibility, Awkwardness, Avoidance, and Policy Opposition. Median (M) scores were computed, and non-parametric tests and multivariate linear regression were used to identify associated factors.
resultsThe overall BC stigma score was relatively low, with a median of 2.16 (36% of the total score). However, stigma was highest in Severity and Financial Discrimination (M = 3.0 and 2.67, respectively), and lowest in Avoidance and Policy Opposition (M = 1.00 and 1.33, respectively). Significantly higher stigma scores were observed in males (M = 2.20), those living in Upper Egypt governorates and rural residents (M = 2.30 and 2.24; respectively), and those with less-than-sufficient family income (M = 2.30). The regression analysis revealed significant associations between stigma and various sociodemographic variables, including sex, age, educational year, residence, and family income (p-values < 0.001), and BC-related questions such as history of breast problems and sufficient awareness about BC (both p < 0.001). The primary sources of information about BC for medical students were found to be medical curricula (24.2%), internet/social media (20.0%), and healthcare professionals (16.3%).
conclusionThis study provides an insight into exploring BC stigma among medical students. While the overall stigma was relatively low, significant disparities persist, particularly regarding perceived Severity among male and rural participants. Future interventions should target students with high levels of stigma through curricular reforms that incorporate anti-stigma training.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.