Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146148›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025

Byte into sustainability: a scoping review of digital food environment attributes that shape consumers' sustainability perceptions, attitudes, intentions, and behaviours.

Hannah Boen, Louise Glenisson, Lotte Hallez, Tim Smits

Abstract readScoping ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah BoenMedia, Information & Persuasion Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. hannah.boen@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4912-4362
Louise GlenissonMedia, Information & Persuasion Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5363-2210
Lotte HallezMedia, Information & Persuasion Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5371-2701
Tim SmitsMedia, Information & Persuasion Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-5421

Funding

European Commission GA no. 101136507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent food systems harm both planetary and human health. Meanwhile, our food choices are increasingly influenced by the digital food environment: spaces where digital actors (such as influencers) engage in food-related activities (like sharing content) across various platforms (for example, on social media). The digital food environment offers potential to promote more sustainable diets in several ways; for instance, influencers may encourage followers to reduce meat consumption, and supermarket apps can highlight the carbon footprint of different products. However, research on how specific features of the digital food environment, referred to here as digital attributes, affect sustainable food outcomes remains scattered. This scoping review aims to address this gap by: (1) mapping the scope and volume of current research on the relationship between the digital food environment and consumers’ sustainable food outcomes; and (2) identifying digital attributes that influence these outcomes. Consumers’ sustainable food outcomes are defined as consumers’ perceptions, attitudes, intentions, or behaviours related to social, economic, or environmental aspects of food sustainability.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus for peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies were included if they examined the relationship between digital attributes and sustainable food outcomes. A total of 57 articles met the inclusion criteria.

resultsPublications focusing on the relationship between the digital food environment and sustainable food outcomes have been on an upward trend since 2014. Most studies originate from high-income countries (46.9%) and are predominantly quantitative (91%), focusing on general adult populations (88.3%). Across five types of digital media, 86 unique digital attributes were identified. E-commerce emerged as the most frequently studied medium (57.9%), with attributes primarily related to informative messaging and platform design. Social media followed (28.1%). Social media attributes were mainly centred on social media marketing. Other digital media, such as documentaries (7%), were explored far less.

conclusionThis review highlights growing academic interest in the links between digital attributes and consumers’ sustainable food outcomes. Future research should broaden its scope to include other digital media, consumer experiences, and underrepresented populations.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFood SupplyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSustainable DevelopmentDigital MediaFood PreferencesHumansIntentionSocial MediaAttitudesBehavioursConsumersDigital food environmentDigital mediaIntentionsPerceptionsScoping reviewSustainable food

Identifiers

PMID41146148
PMCPMC12560354

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.