SynthesisBMC medicine2025
Indications for the evaluation and supplementation of hypophosphatemia: an umbrella systematic review of reviews and guidelines.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phosphate: An Anion Controlling Metabolic Functions.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Hypophosphatemia in Patients Receiving Intravenous Iron Supplementation for Iron-Deficiency Anemia: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Recurrent Severe Hypophosphatemia Following Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose Infusion: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- The Significance of Hypophosphatemia in Deciding on an Optimal Clinical Choice of Parenteral Iron Therapy in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Slovenia: An Umbrella Review and Economic Evaluation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perioperative Hypophosphatemia Following a Fixed High-Dose Ferric Carboxymaltose Protocol in Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypophosphatemia, defined as low serum phosphate levels, is a frequent yet underrecognized condition associated with significant morbidity. Its etiology ranges from chronic conditions such as osteomalacia to acute states such as refeeding syndrome. This review systematically summarizes evidence and guidelines for phosphate testing and supplementation in adults, aiming to support clinical decision-making.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception to September 2024 included reviews, guidelines, and consensus statements addressing phosphate measurement for hypophosphatemia and supplementation in adults outside intensive care settings. Eligibility criteria included English-language publications focused on diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. Quality assessment was performed using the AGREE II tool, and data were synthesized across chronic and acute clinical contexts.
resultsThirty-three publications (11 guidelines, 19 reviews, and 3 consensus statements) were included, with high heterogeneity in the recommendations. Phosphate measurement to evaluate chronic hypophosphatemia is recommended for persistent musculoskeletal symptoms, osteoporosis evaluation, and rare conditions known to cause chronic hypophosphatemia, such as X-linked hypophosphatemia and tumor-induced osteomalacia. The post-kidney transplantation stage requires intensive early monitoring for hypophosphatemia. Recommendations for testing for drug-induced hypophosphatemia, such as with ferric carboxymaltose, vary. Phosphate measurement to evaluate acute hypophosphatemia is advised in high-risk settings: refeeding syndrome, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome, alcoholic ketoacidosis, worsening COPD or asthma exacerbations. Further potential indications for phosphate measurement include certain iron infusions, tenofovir treatment, immediate post-kidney transplantation, and intensive hemodialysis. Supplementation is indicated for severe or symptomatic cases, with oral therapy preferred for chronic conditions and intravenous routes for acute, severe hypophosphatemia.
conclusionsThe heterogeneity in the recommendations emphasizes the need for individualized approaches based on clinical context. While robust evidence supports testing and supplementation under select conditions, gaps remain regarding optimal dosing and monitoring protocols. Clinicians should consider phosphate testing in high-risk scenarios and follow evidence-based supplementation guidelines tailored to chronic and acute hypophosphatemia. Future research is needed to unify recommendations and address existing uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.