ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2025
Documentation and evaluation of care of dying patients.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the quality of documentation and delivery of EOLC in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare with a pre-pandemic audit. Design: Retrospective clinical audit of medical records of patients who died in ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic, January 2021 to February 2022, using the Documentation and Evaluation of Care of Dying Equation (DECODE) survey tool. Setting: Three metropolitan adult ICUs in Victoria, Australia. Main outcomes: DECODE audit score, patient characteristics, demographics, end of life planning, quality of death indicators, management of dying. Results: There were 194 deaths over a 14-month period. 2 cases were excluded. Patients wishes were documented in 83 (43%) cases. A total of 175 patients (91%) were receiving active treatment 24 h before death. A total of 166 deaths (86%) were expected and occurred a mean of 4.5 (IQR 2-9) days from admission to ICU. A total of 52 (27%) had palliative or symptom control care plans. The median DECODE score was 14 (IQR 12-15) with statistical variation across the three sites ( Conclusion: EOLC in ICU remains challenging due to diagnostic dilemmas, prognostic uncertainty, and short time-frames. Assessment of quality of EoLC care helps assess and possibly improve provision of care. The DECODE questionnaire provides a semi-objective measure of quality of care provided to the dying patient in ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.