ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Colchicine and cardiovascular outcomes in MINOCA: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: MINOCA accounts for 5 %-15 % of myocardial infarctions and is defined by <50 % coronary stenosis without an alternative diagnosis, with heterogeneous mechanisms that complicate care. Given the role of inflammation and microvascular dysfunction, we evaluated whether colchicine improves outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a federated health research network of 134 million patients from 102 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and no revascularization after cardiac catheterization and without alternative diagnosis of elevated troponin were classified as MINOCA according to AHA criteria. Patients with MINOCA on colchicine (≥1 year of use for any indication) were propensity score matched with patients who were not on colchicine. Results: The primary composite outcome defined as AMI recurrence, all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular events, and all-cause hospitalizations, was significantly lower with colchicine (HR 0.839, 95 % CI 0.750-0.938, Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort, there was a trend toward reduced cardiovascular outcomes in patients with MINOCA who were on colchicine. These findings support further prospective evaluation of colchicine in this understudied population. Meeting presentation: A portion of this work was presented as a poster at the 2025 American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session (Abstract #1047-113) on March 29, 2025, but the full manuscript and supplementary material remain unpublished. All authors have reviewed and approved the submission and report no conflicts of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.