ReviewJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2025
Targeting disrupted networks in schizophrenia: Can muscarinic drugs make a fundamental difference?
Review in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New treatments for schizophrenia are urgently needed because existing antipsychotic drugs mainly improve positive symptoms, with minimal effect on cognitive deficits and negative symptoms. The approval of Karuna Therapeutics (KarXT) in 2024 marked a significant milestone, as it became the first antipsychotic drug to target muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) rather than dopamine receptors. Here, we provide a perspective on how targeting mAChRs might improve the positive, negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. First, we revisit the prevailing view that xanomeline acts primarily as a M1 and M4 mAChR partial agonist. Next, we examine potential pharmacological overlap with clozapine, focusing on actions at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT7 receptors and consider whether 5-HT receptor subtype agonism, inverse agonism or antagonism could be important for therapeutic efficacy. We then review the brain systems and networks impacted by muscarinic receptor subtypes in the context of Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) domains. We propose that, based on their cellular and regional expression, muscarinic receptor subtypes impact several cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical loops and interrelated networks to improve RDoC-informed sensorimotor, positive valence, social processes, arousal and regulation, and cognitive systems. Taken together, these data suggest that there are neurobiological reasons for optimism for muscarinic agents to improve the classically described positive, negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, although the relative contribution of each mAChR subtype (M1-M5) remains unclear. We propose that a multi-targeted approach combining actions at 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptors could provide additional therapeutic benefits across a range of RDoC domains and hence be of clinical benefit trans-diagonistically beyond schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.