Evidence mapPaperPMID 41147421Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025

Local and Systemic Responses to Low-Intensity Cycling With Blood Flow Restriction Compared to High-Intensity Cycling: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Sanghyeon Ji, Michael Boschmann, Michael Behringer, Patrick Wahl, Alexander Franz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanghyeon JiSection Exercise Physiology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4787-4699
Michael BoschmannExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Michael BehringerDepartment of Sports Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Patrick WahlSection Exercise Physiology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander FranzDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft PR020200900248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing interest in blood flow restriction (BFR) for enhancing training adaptations, its acute impacts on local and systemic physiological stress remain incompletely understood. This study compared the metabolic and perceptual responses of low-intensity cycling (LI) with BFR (LI + BFR) to both LI and high-intensity (HI) cycling without BFR, matched for time and external work. Ten males (26.9 ± 4.6 years) completed LI (20 min at 55% peak aerobic power output, PPO), LI + BFR (with 50% limb occlusion pressure), and HI (10 × 1 min at 90% PPO interspersed with 1-min recovery at 20% PPO) protocols in a randomized cross-over design. Interstitial metabolic responses were assessed via microdialysis in the vastus lateralis; systemic blood responses were evaluated via venous blood gas analysis. Cardiorespiratory responses, including heart rate, oxygen uptake, and ventilation, were continuously monitored during exercise. Serum creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured as indirect markers of muscle damage, and perceptual responses were documented. Muscle interstitial lactate and pyruvate were highest in HI, followed by LI + BFR, and lowest in LI (p < 0.05). Systemic blood and cardiorespiratory responses were comparable between LI + BFR and HI and exceeded LI (p < 0.05), while electrolyte shifts occurred across all conditions (p < 0.001) without between-condition differences. All protocols increased CK and LDH 24-48 h post-exercise, with the greatest increases in HI (p < 0.05). Perceived exertion and pain were higher in LI + BFR than in other conditions (p < 0.05). In conclusion, BFR intensifies local and systemic stress during LI and may be a potent strategy to promote muscle adaptive stimulus. However, when time and total external work are matched, high mechanical loading appears more effective in inducing local stress, which may be essential for further muscular adaptation processes.

Indexed as

BicyclingBlood Flow Restriction TherapyQuadriceps MuscleAdultCreatine KinaseCross-Over StudiesHeart RateHumansLactic AcidL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionPyruvic AcidRegional Blood FlowYoung AdultCreatine KinaseLactic AcidL-Lactate DehydrogenasePyruvic Acidaerobic exerciseblood‐flow‐restricted exercisehyperkalemiainterstitial fluidmechanical stressmetabolic stress

Identifiers

PMID41147421
PMCPMC12560157

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.