Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41148279›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Paraspinal muscle quality in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of muscle atrophy and fat infiltration.

Ioannis Kalli, Marili Niglas, Maryam Kazemi Naeini, Maxim Freidin, Louise Thomas, Cristina Menni, Frances Williams

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. A multicenter study on the prediction model for chronic low back pain after lumbar decompression surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus: integration of metabolic and paraspinal muscle features.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ioannis KalliKing's College London, London, UK. ioannis.kalli@kcl.ac.uk.
Marili NiglasUniversity of Westminster, London, UK.
Maryam Kazemi NaeiniKing's College London, London, UK.
Maxim FreidinKing's College London, London, UK.
Louise ThomasUniversity of Westminster, London, UK.
Cristina MenniKing's College London, London, UK.
Frances WilliamsKing's College London, London, UK. frances.williams@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Chronic Disease Research Foundation 28/2023Versus Arthritis 22467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic low back pain (cLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide, yet the specific musculoskeletal mechanisms underlying symptom persistence remain poorly understood. Structural changes in the spine-supporting paraspinal muscles, particularly the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major, have been implicated in its pathophysiology, but current evidence remains inconclusive. PURPOSE: To summarise and quantify differences in lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology and composition—specifically total cross-sectional area (tCSA), functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), and fat infiltration (FI)—between individuals with cLBP and asymptomatic controls, with stratification by vertebral level to assess segmental specificity. STUDY DESIGN/

settingSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsA comprehensive literature search of electronic databases was conducted. Twenty-one studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 10 met criteria for meta-analysis. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using random-effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed by vertebral level. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of study quality and methodological factors. OUTCOME MEASURES: Imaging-derived assessments of paraspinal muscle tCSA, fCSA, and FI.

resultsIndividuals with cLBP exhibited significantly lower multifidus tCSA and fCSA, alongside higher FI, particularly at mid-to-lower lumbar levels (L3/L4 to L5), indicating segment-specific muscle atrophy. These findings were generally robust across sensitivity analyses, though some were influenced by demographic and methodological variability. In contrast, differences in erector spinae and psoas major were less consistent, often confined to isolated lumbar levels or revealed only after sensitivity testing. High between-study heterogeneity was attributed to differences in imaging modality, muscle segmentation techniques, and participant characteristics.

conclusionsMultifidus demonstrates the most consistent structural alterations among paraspinal muscles in individuals with cLBP, reinforcing its potential relevance in diagnosis and the development of targeted rehabilitation strategies. Future research should prioritise standardised imaging protocols and reporting practices to reduce heterogeneity and improve clinical translation.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueChronic PainLow Back PainMuscular AtrophyParaspinal MusclesHumansChronic low back painCross-sectional areaFat infiltrationLumbar spineMuscle atrophyParaspinal muscles

Identifiers

PMID41148279
PMCPMC13241407

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.