Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41148801›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Immunoproteasomes in Skeletal Muscle Pathologies: Emerging Roles, Conflicting Evidence, and Future Directions.

Alexander Kalinkovich, Gregory Livshits

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander KalinkovichDepartment of Anatomy and Anthropology, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6927846, Israel.
Gregory LivshitsDepartment of Anatomy and Anthropology, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6927846, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3766-7493

Funding

Ariel University RA2000000457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle pathologies, including sarcopenia, inflammatory myopathies, and various muscular dystrophies, are strongly influenced by chronic low-grade inflammation and impaired proteostasis. Immunoproteasomes (IMPs), inducible proteolytic complexes activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, are emerging as regulators linking immune signaling to protein quality control. Evidence suggests that IMPs have paradoxical, context-dependent roles in skeletal muscle. On one hand, they can support proteostasis and muscle regeneration under stress; on the other, persistent activation may sustain cytokine production, antigen presentation, and maladaptive immune-muscle interactions, promoting chronic inflammation and muscle wasting. Selective IMP inhibitors, such as ONX 0914 and KZR-616, display potent anti-inflammatory effects in preclinical models of autoimmune myositis and muscle atrophy. Yet, their use in skeletal muscle pathologies is controversial; while inhibition may dampen harmful immune activation, it could also impair muscle repair and proteostasis. This review summarizes current findings, highlights key contradictions, and explores unresolved questions about the role of IMPs in skeletal muscle pathologies. We emphasize the need for a deeper understanding of IMP-mediated mechanisms in skeletal muscle pathology and strategies combining selective inhibitors to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. IMPs thus represent both a promising and potentially risky therapeutic target, with outcomes highly dependent on disease context.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexAnimalsHumansInflammationProteostasisProteasome Endopeptidase Complexchronic inflammationimmunoproteasomessarcopeniaskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID41148801
PMCPMC12563864

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.