ReviewCells2025
Immunoproteasomes in Skeletal Muscle Pathologies: Emerging Roles, Conflicting Evidence, and Future Directions.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscle pathologies, including sarcopenia, inflammatory myopathies, and various muscular dystrophies, are strongly influenced by chronic low-grade inflammation and impaired proteostasis. Immunoproteasomes (IMPs), inducible proteolytic complexes activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, are emerging as regulators linking immune signaling to protein quality control. Evidence suggests that IMPs have paradoxical, context-dependent roles in skeletal muscle. On one hand, they can support proteostasis and muscle regeneration under stress; on the other, persistent activation may sustain cytokine production, antigen presentation, and maladaptive immune-muscle interactions, promoting chronic inflammation and muscle wasting. Selective IMP inhibitors, such as ONX 0914 and KZR-616, display potent anti-inflammatory effects in preclinical models of autoimmune myositis and muscle atrophy. Yet, their use in skeletal muscle pathologies is controversial; while inhibition may dampen harmful immune activation, it could also impair muscle repair and proteostasis. This review summarizes current findings, highlights key contradictions, and explores unresolved questions about the role of IMPs in skeletal muscle pathologies. We emphasize the need for a deeper understanding of IMP-mediated mechanisms in skeletal muscle pathology and strategies combining selective inhibitors to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. IMPs thus represent both a promising and potentially risky therapeutic target, with outcomes highly dependent on disease context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.