ReviewCells2025
The Evolution, Current Landscape, and Future Prospects of Oncolytic Virotherapy in Melanoma: Talimogene Laherparepvec and Beyond.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Progress in Virotherapy: Application and Future Prospects in Head and Neck Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Landscape of T-cell bispecific antibodies in cancer therapy: therapeutic strategies, challenges and future prospection.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Recent advances in oncolytic virotherapy: insights from clinical trials and combination treatment strategies.Virology journal · 2026Review
- Microbial reprogramming of immunogenic cell death: a new paradigm in tumor immunotherapy.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in melanoma: regulatory cell death pathways and their implications for immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Biodistribution, shedding, and transmissibility of vusolimogene oderparepvec (RP1).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses represent an emerging class of therapeutic agents that have the potential to transform the care of patients with melanoma. In this narrative review, we describe the evolution of oncolytic virus approaches. We begin by describing early investigations using wild type viruses and then the development of sophisticated Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) variant constructs such as talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and vusolimogene oderparepvec (Replimune-1, RP1), which incorporate deletions of viral genes and expression of human or synthetic transgenes to promote tumor selectivity, dendritic cell recruitment, antigen presentation, and stimulation of systemic anti-tumor immune responses. We review the status of clinical trials of oncolytic viruses in melanoma, highlight regulatory challenges, and describe important concepts and key remaining questions within the field. While T-VEC remains the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved oncolytic virus for melanoma treatment, ongoing research focusing on next-generation viral constructs and combination strategies aims to further improve clinical outcomes and expand the applicability of oncolytic virus therapy in melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.