Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149076›Full record

ArticleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Utility of a Multimodal Biomarker Panel and Serum Proapoptotic Activity to Refine Diagnosis of Ovarian Adnexal Masses.

Andrea Molina-Pineda, Francisco Osiel Jauregui-Salazar, Aleyda Guadalupe Zamudio-Martínez, Sayma Vizcarra-Ramos, Jesús García-Gómez, Benjamín González-Amézquita, Lizeth Montserrat Aguilar-Vazquez, Raquel Villegas-Pacheco, Rodolfo Hernandez-Gutierrez, Luis Felipe Jave-Suárez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea Molina-PinedaCentro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C. (CIATEJ), Guadalajara 44270, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8313-1932
Francisco Osiel Jauregui-SalazarUnidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara 44349, Mexico.
Aleyda Guadalupe Zamudio-MartínezFacultad de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán 80040, Mexico.
Sayma Vizcarra-RamosCentro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente (CIBO), División de Inmunología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara 44340, Mexico.
Jesús García-GómezCentro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente (CIBO), División de Inmunología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara 44340, Mexico.
Benjamín González-AmézquitaUnidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara 44349, Mexico.
Lizeth Montserrat Aguilar-VazquezCentro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente (CIBO), División de Inmunología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara 44340, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0009-3427-0854
Raquel Villegas-PachecoUnidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara 44349, Mexico.
Rodolfo Hernandez-GutierrezCentro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C. (CIATEJ), Guadalajara 44270, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-6825
Luis Felipe Jave-SuárezCentro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente (CIBO), División de Inmunología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara 44340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6209-5031
Adriana Aguilar-LemarroyCentro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente (CIBO), División de Inmunología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara 44340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-4824

Funding

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) R-2023-785-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesOvarian adnexal masses present diagnostic challenges due to their heterogeneous etiologies. Accurately differentiating these conditions is critical for timely and effective clinical intervention. This study evaluated circulating molecules and serum-induced apoptosis as complementary tools to conventional diagnostic methods (CA125, HE4, and the ROMA index) for distinguishing benign masses from malignant masses.

methodsA cohort of 136 participants (9 healthy controls, 87 women with benign ovarian adnexal masses and 40 with malignant ovarian adnexal masses) was analyzed. The induction of apoptosis in Jurkat cells by patient serum was assessed using flow cytometry. Serum concentrations of sFas/CD95, HE4, CA125, and additional molecules were measured by ELISA and LEGENDplex™. Clinical, ultrasonographic, and histopathological data were correlated with tumor malignancy. To improve diagnostic performance beyond individual biomarkers, we developed two multiparametric classifiers that integrate the dominant parameters identified through group divergence analysis and ROC evaluation across multiple clinical comparisons.

resultsMalignant tumors were associated with older age (51.45 ± 8.35 years,

conclusionsThe evaluation of CA125, HE4, MRP8/14, and apoptosis (Classifier 1) and, more prominently, the measurement of additional molecules: OPN, SAA, IL-6, IL-8, and IGFBP-4 (Classifier 2), systematically outperformed the ROMA. Both achieved superior specificity and balanced accuracy (Youden's J index) across all clinical comparisons by capturing the biological diversity of malignancies.

Indexed as

adnexal massesapoptosisCA125HE4MRP8/14OPNovarian cancerSAAsCD95sFas

Identifiers

PMID41149076
PMCPMC12563309

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.