Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149181›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Research on Wind Field Correction Method Integrating Position Information and Proxy Divergence.

Jianhong Gan, Mengjia Zhang, Cen Gao, Peiyang Wei, Zhibin Li, Chunjiang Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianhong GanCollege of Software Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China.
Mengjia ZhangCollege of Software Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China.
Cen GaoObservation Centre, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China.
Peiyang WeiCollege of Software Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China.ORCID 0009-0008-9632-8006
Zhibin LiCollege of Software Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China.
Chunjiang WuCollege of Software Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China.

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China Grant No. 2022YFC3004103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy of numerical model outputs strongly depends on the quality of the initial wind field, yet ground observation data are typically sparse and provide incomplete spatial coverage. More importantly, many current mainstream correction models rely on reanalysis grid datasets like ERA5 as the true value, which relies on interpolation calculation, which directly affects the accuracy of the correction results. To address these issues, we propose a new deep learning model, PPWNet. The model directly uses sparse and discretely distributed observation data as the true value, which integrates observation point positions and a physical consistency term to achieve a high-precision corrected wind field. The model design is inspired by biological intelligence. First, observation point positions are encoded as input and observation values are included in the loss function. Second, a parallel dual-branch DenseInception network is employed to extract multi-scale grid features, simulating the hierarchical processing of the biological visual system. Meanwhile, PPWNet references the PointNet architecture and introduces an attention mechanism to efficiently extract features from sparse and irregular observation positions. This mechanism reflects the selective focus of cognitive functions. Furthermore, this paper incorporates physical knowledge into the model optimization process by adding a learned physical consistency term to the loss function, ensuring that the corrected results not only approximate the observations but also adhere to physical laws. Finally, hyperparameters are automatically tuned using the Bayesian TPE algorithm. Experiments demonstrate that PPWNet outperforms both traditional and existing deep learning methods. It reduces the MAE by 38.65% and the RMSE by 28.93%. The corrected wind field shows better agreement with observations in both wind speed and direction, confirming the effectiveness of incorporating position information and a physics-informed approach into deep learning-based wind field correction.

Indexed as

attention mechanismhyperparameter optimizationphysical consistencypointnetposition informationwind field correction

Identifiers

PMID41149181
PMCPMC12561337

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.