ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Human Intention and Motion Prediction Framework for Applications in Human-Centric Digital Twins.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modular Framework for Responsive and Explainable Robotic Assistance with Intention Prediction Using Human-Centric Digital Twins.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predictive fatigue-aware human-robot collaboration: a real-time, open-source ROS 2 instantiation of a three-module human-centric digital twin framework on a standard cobot.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- A methodological framework and experimental protocol for proactive human-robot collaboration with multimodal intention prediction and adaptive control.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In manufacturing settings where humans and machines collaborate, understanding and predicting human intention is crucial for enabling the seamless execution of tasks. This knowledge is the basis for creating an intelligent, symbiotic, and collaborative environment. However, current foundation models often fall short in directly anticipating complex tasks and producing contextually appropriate motion. This paper proposes a modular framework that investigates strategies for structuring task knowledge and engineering context-rich prompts to guide Vision-Language Models in understanding and predicting human intention in semi-structured environments. Our evaluation, conducted across three use cases of varying complexity, reveals a critical tradeoff between prediction accuracy and latency. We demonstrate that a Rolling Context Window strategy, which uses a history of frames and the previously predicted state, achieves a strong balance of performance and efficiency. This approach significantly outperforms single-image inputs and computationally expensive in-context learning methods. Furthermore, incorporating egocentric video views yields a substantial 10.7% performance increase in complex tasks. For short-term motion forecasting, we show that the accuracy of joint position estimates is enhanced by using historical pose, gaze data, and in-context examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.