ArticleMetabolites2025
Untargeted Metabolomics of Dairy Cows as Influenced by the Combinations of Essential Oil Blends and Fumaric Acid as Natural Feed Additives Using RUSITEC.
Article in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomic Approaches in Fermented Meat Products: Focus on Lactic Acid Bacteria and Starter Cultures.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Synergistic metabolism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe potential of essential oils (EOs) and fumaric acid (FA) to modulate ruminal fermentation and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in dairy cows has attracted significant attention. However, little is known about the specific metabolites produced as a result of their interaction. This study investigated the combined effects of essential oil blends (EOBs) and FA on rumen metabolites using a rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system. MATERIALS AND
methodsThree rumen-cannulated, non-lactating Holstein Friesian cows served as inoculum donors. The total mixed ration (TMR; CON) comprised corn silage (60%), alfalfa hay (20%), and concentrate (20%). Three distinct EOBs were formulated: EOB1 [Garlic, Lemongrass, Cumin, Lavender, and Nutmeg; at 4:2:2:1:1, respectively], EOB2 [Anise, Clove, Oregano, Cedarwood, and Ginger; at 4:2:2:1:1, respectively], and EOB3 [Clove, Anise, Peppermint, and Oregano; at 4:3:2:1, respectively]. Four treatments evaluated were control (CON), EFA1 (EOB1 + FA), EFA2 (EOB2 + FA), and EFA3 (EOB3 + FA). EOBs and FA were included at 10 µL/g feed and 3% of TMR, respectively. Rumen effluents were collected over 5 days for metabolome analysis using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
resultsA total of 661 metabolites were detected and identified. Volcano plot analysis revealed 13 differentially abundant metabolites for EFA1, 41 for EFA2, and 19 for EFA3 compared to CON group. PLS-DA analysis showed clear separation of treatments, indicating modifications in the rumen fluid metabolome.
conclusionsThe treatments led to the enrichment of pathways involved in amino acid, nucleotide, cofactor, and energy metabolism. These additives have the potential to optimize nutrient utilization and overall animal health. Therefore, in vivo studies should be conducted to validate their efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.