Evidence mapPaperPMID 41149702Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025

Organ-Specific Strategies in Bioprinting: Addressing Translational Challenges in the Heart, Liver, Kidney, and Pancreas.

Mohamad Al Qassab, Moustafa Merheb, Safaa Sayadi, Pia Salloum, Zeina Dabbousi, Anthony Bayeh, Frederic Harb, Sami Azar, Hilda E Ghadieh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohamad Al QassabDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Al Koura, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon.
Moustafa MerhebDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Al Koura, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon.
Safaa SayadiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Al Koura, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon.
Pia SalloumDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Al Koura, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon.
Zeina DabbousiDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Caucasus International University, 0141 Tbilisi, Georgia.
Anthony BayehDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Al Koura, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon.ORCID 0009-0001-6411-0351
Frederic HarbDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Al Koura, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-5882-1619
Sami AzarDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Al Koura, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon.
Hilda E GhadiehDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Al Koura, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-7983-2090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ bioprinting is a rapidly evolving field designed to address the persistent shortage of donor organs by engineering patient-specific tissues that replicate the function and structure of natural organs. Despite significant technological advancements, bioprinting still faces major obstacles, including tissue rejection, inadequate vascularization, limited physiological functionality, and various ethical and translational challenges. In this review, we assess current bioprinting modalities, particularly extrusion-based printing, inkjet printing, laser-assisted bioprinting (LAB), and stereolithography/digital light processing (SLA/DLP), highlighting their individual strengths and limitations. We also explore different bioink formulations, focusing especially on hybrid bioinks as promising solutions to traditional bioink constraints. Additionally, this article thoroughly evaluates bioprinting strategies for four major organs: heart, liver, kidney, and pancreas. Each organ presents unique anatomical and physiological complexities, from cardiomyocyte immaturity and electromechanical mismatch in cardiac tissues to vascularization and zonation challenges in liver structures, intricate nephron patterning in kidney constructs, and immune rejection issues in pancreatic islet transplantation. Regulatory and ethical considerations critical for clinical translation are also addressed. By systematically analyzing these aspects, this review clarifies current gaps, emerging solutions, and future directions, providing a comprehensive perspective on advancing organ bioprinting toward clinical application.

Indexed as

bioinksextrusion-based printinglaser-assisted bioprintingorgan bioprintingregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41149702
PMCPMC12565448

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.