ArticlePloS one2025
Relative age of youth swimmers and their sporting performance at the end of the season.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the influence of relative age on the athletic and academic performance of young swimmers, while also considering other contributing factors such as training conditions, anthropometric characteristics, and coaches' subjective evaluations. A descriptive, explanatory, and prospective design was employed, using quantitative (questionnaires) and observational methods. The sample consisted of 33 national-level swimmers (11 males and 22 females). Variables analyzed included sex, date of birth, training data, academic performance (AP), final sport performance (SP), coaches' perceptions of daily performance, and anthropometric measurements. Results indicated no direct effect of relative age on the main variables. However, ANCOVA revealed significant differences based on birth quartile (p = .001), month of birth (p = .001), training frequency (p = .003), and body weight when mediated by sport category. Additionally, significant associations were found between relative age and sport performance when BMI was included as a covariate (p = .036), along with year and month of birth (p = .038; p = .027). Coaches' perceptions of performance were also significantly related to competitive category (p = .033). It is concluded that while relative age may influence athletic performance, its effect appears to be mediated by contextual and individual factors related to the athlete's preparation and environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.