Trial reportEuropean heart journal2026
Stratified treatment of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: the PROMISE trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health related quality of life and cardiac symptoms following admission for suspected MINOCA: A post-hoc analysis of the MINOCA-BAT randomized clinical trial.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Intravascular imaging in myocardial infarction and ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
- What we don't see, we don't treat: sex, risk, and recognition in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Pathophysiology, Clinical Phenotypes, and Mechanism-Guided Diagnostic Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Contemporary Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: From Rapid Diagnosis to Early Secondary Prevention.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- 5-Fluorouracil-associated coronary vasospasm with takotsubo-like myocardial dysfunction: A case report.Journal of cardiology cases · 2026Article
- Coronary Artery Disease in Women: Sex-Specific Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Advancements in MINOCA: Do They Translate to a Better Clinical Outcome? A Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Exploration of the Etiology to Guide Therapy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodality Imaging to Determine Underlying Causes of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries in Women and Men.Circulation · 2026Article
- Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) in a Middle-Aged Male: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- The Role of Serum Biomarkers for the Differential Diagnosis and Prognostic Assessment of Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Intracoronary Imaging for the Management of Vulnerable Plaques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Coronary Physiology Across the Whole Spectrum of Ischemic Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Coronary artery spasm: mechanisms, risk factors, and translational strategies for precision management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Device-Based Therapies for Refractory Angina.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsMyocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is associated with a significant risk of mortality, rehospitalization, and angina burden. Despite its clinical impact, no randomized clinical trials have hitherto evaluated optimal management strategy for MINOCA. The PROMISE trial was designed to assess whether a stratified treatment improves clinical outcomes in patients with MINOCA as compared to standard care.
methodsPROMISE is a multicentre randomized trial. Patients with MINOCA were randomized 1:1 to either a stratified treatment based on a comprehensive diagnostic workup aimed at identifying the underlying aetiology, or to standard care. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in the change in angina status at 12 months, assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score (SAQSS). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization and repeated coronary angiography. The trial was terminated early upon recommendation by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board due to clear benefits observed in the intervention group and potential harm in the control group.
resultsOf 101 randomized patients, 92 were confirmed as MINOCA and included in the final analysis (mean age 62 ± 13 years, 48% women; stratified treatment n = 45; standard care n = 47). At 12-month follow-up, SAQSS was significantly higher in the stratified treatment than in standard care group, with a mean between-group difference of +9.38 in favour of the stratified treatment (95% confidence interval 6.81 to 11.95; P < .001). MACE occurred in 1 patient (2.2%) in the stratified treatment and in 4 patients (8.5%) in the standard care group, though the difference was not statistically significant (P = .18).
conclusionsIn this first randomized trial of treatment strategies in MINOCA, a stratified treatment, based on comprehensive diagnostic assessment and aetiology-guided therapy, led to a significant improvement in angina-related health status. While the study findings provide the first evidence supporting individualized management in this heterogeneous and often under-recognized patient population, these results require confirmation in a larger prospective study with longer follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.