ArticleScientific reports2025
Flow rate selection depends on the size of allergen particles to achieve optimal nasal irrigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clearance efficiency of allergen particles during nasal irrigation is a quantitative standard for evaluating the effectiveness of nasal irrigation. Due to the difficulty in obtaining various parameters in in vivo experiments, this study aims to establish a numerical model of the nasal cavity based on CT scan images of healthy adults. We chose four different levels of allergen particles, PM1, PM5, PM10, and PM25, as the subjects. A quantitative analysis was conducted to determine the clearance efficiency of the four levels of allergen particles by five different inlet flow rates of the irrigation solution. The results showed that the clearance efficiency of PM1 allergens was optimal at the inlet flow rate of 1.8 [Formula: see text], equivalent to 2.10 [Formula: see text]. In summary, selecting an appropriate flow rate is necessary to achieve the best clearance efficiency for different levels of allergen particles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.