ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2026
Structural immunity: immune cells as architects of tissue barriers.
Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted design of self-assembling peptide hydrogels for neural regeneration: Principles and opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- The immune engram: a spatial model of immunological memory.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Article
- Boron as a Molecular Architect of Host-Microbiome Symbiosis: Implications for Dysbiosis and Aging-Related Pathologies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ADSC-Conditioned Medium Mitigates LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury by Inhibiting Alveolar Macrophage Pyroptosis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- 4D multimodal wound healing atlas reveals organ-level controls of repair phase transitions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Harnessing neutrophils for tissue repair and regeneration: mechanisms, biomaterial engineering strategies and translational potential.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- The neutrophil collective.Cell · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of structural immunity, as defined in this Perspective, posits that the first line of immune defence against foreign agents and tissue damage involves the preventative, physical reinforcement of tissue barriers and that this fundamental task can be directly or indirectly regulated by immune cells. Indeed, several types of leukocytes can help build protective barriers when required, potentially either by depositing matrix components themselves in certain circumstances or, more generally, by interactions with canonical structural cells and the existing extracellular matrix. This concept of structural functions of immune cells challenges the rigidity with which mammalian tissue organization and immune defence have been traditionally compartmentalized. Although there is strong momentum in the evidence for structural immunity that has been acquired so far, the field lacks a comprehensive overview of these data as well as a critical evaluation of this concept. Here, we place independent findings from several groups into a working model of immune cells as the architects of tissue barriers, to present a framework on which new concepts and findings in this area can develop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41152441What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.