ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Feasibility, Safety, and Tolerability of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRemote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has shown promise as a neuroprotective strategy, but its application in children with cerebral palsy (CP) remains unexplored. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of repeated, 6-7 sessions of RIC in children with unilateral CP.
methodsFifty-one children aged 6-16 years with unilateral CP were randomized (1:1) to receive RIC or sham conditioning on the more affected arm. Primary feasibility outcomes included recruitment metrics, intervention adherence, retention, and protocol fidelity. Safety endpoints included continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation, blood pressure, heart rate, and adverse event incidence. Tolerability was assessed via child-reported pain ratings, conditioning pressure tolerance, skin integrity evaluations, and session adherence.
resultsOf 148 children screened, 51 were randomized to RIC (n = 25), sham (n = 26) groups; 48 (94.1%) completed the intervention as allocated. Recruitment yielded 2.04 participants/month. Intervention adherence was 100% in both groups. RIC was well tolerated, with mean pain scores 2.8 ± 3.1 during inflation in RIC and 0.3 ± 0.8 in Sham group. No serious adverse events occurred. Physiological parameters remained stable across 314 conditioning sessions; no clinically significant hypoxemia, blood pressure derangements, or arrhythmias were detected. Minor adverse events (transient erythema, mild discomfort) were rare (2.22%) and self-limiting. Skin integrity was preserved, and no participants required session termination.
conclusionsRepeated RIC is feasible, safe, and tolerable in children with unilateral CP. These findings support the design of future trials using RIC as a priming agent to enhance pediatric neurorehabilitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.