ReviewBiomedicines2025
Immune Dysregulation in Sepsis. A Narrative Review for the Clinicians.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of different extracorporeal blood purification strategies during continuous renal replacement therapy in septic shock patients.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding Immune Dysregulation in Sepsis Through Extracellular Vesicles: A Path to Precision Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Article
- Severe community-acquired pneumonia: an integral approach.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- The incremental value of a novel immuno-inflammatory index (SIICI) in predicting sepsis after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: development and validation of a nomogram.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Neutrophil immunometabolism in ACLF and sepsis: mechanisms, dysfunction, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Interleukin Network in Sepsis: From Cytokine Storm to Clinical Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune dysregulation presents a significant clinical challenge due to its rapid progression and complex interplay between hyperinflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. Different responses from the innate and adaptive immune systems can result in diseases such as immunoparalysis, cytokine storms, and secondary infections. Current diagnostic methods remain non-specific and time-consuming, delaying targeted interventions. A compartmentalized approach to immune monitoring, distinguishing innate and acquired immune response functional differentiation, is essential for distinguishing between hyperactivation and suppression. Key biomarkers, including cytokines, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), and CD4/CD8 counts, as well as Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PDL-1) and V-type immunoglobulin domain-containing suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA) regulators, can guide personalized treatment strategies. Although they need more clinical validation, novel therapeutic methods such as cytokine inhibitors, immunological stimulants, and immunomodulators have demonstrated promise. Early diagnosis and precision medicine developments could lead to better patient outcomes. Advances in non-coding RNAs have led to specific diagnostic panels based on microRNA (MiRNA) levels. A deeper understanding of immune imbalance in sepsis is critical for optimizing treatment and reducing mortality rates. This review highlights emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to address the multifaceted nature of sepsis-related immune dysregulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.