ReviewBiomedicines2025
Head-to-Head in Heart Failure: Comparative Insights on Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential Outcomes with Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with increasing prevalence driven by aging populations and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus. Recent advances have highlighted sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, particularly empagliflozin and dapagliflozin, as effective agents in HF management across a broad spectrum of ejection fractions. Initially developed for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, both drugs have demonstrated significant cardiovascular benefits, including reductions in HF hospitalizations and improvements in symptoms and quality of life. Their mechanisms extend beyond glucose lowering, involving natriuresis, osmotic diuresis, improved myocardial energetics, reduced sympathetic activation, and anti-inflammatory effects. While empagliflozin and dapagliflozin share a core renal mechanism via selective SGLT2 inhibition, subtle differences in pharmacokinetics, potency, and tissue selectivity may influence their clinical profiles. Emerging evidence suggests empagliflozin may confer stronger benefits in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), while dapagliflozin could offer enhanced efficacy in heart failure with preserved ejection franction (HFpEF), although head-to-head comparisons are lacking. This review synthesizes current evidence comparing the mechanisms of action and clinical performance of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in HF, providing insight into agent selection and future directions in therapy personalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.