Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41153981›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Update on Reovirus Infections in Waterfowls.

Szilvia L Farkas, Zsófia Lanszki, Yashpal S Malik, Vito Martella, Vilmos Palya, Krisztián Bányai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Szilvia L FarkasDepartment of Obstetrics and Food Animal Medicine Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia LanszkiNational Laboratory of Virology, Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3116-4633
Yashpal S MalikICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute (ICAR-IVRI) Mukteswar, Nainital 263138, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2832-4854
Vito MartellaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70010 Valenzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5740-6947
Vilmos PalyaCeva-Phylaxia Ltd., 1107 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3319-9995
Krisztián BányaiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00001National Research, Development and Innovation Office RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reovirus infections pose a significant threat to waterfowl health and productivity globally. This review provides a comprehensive update on various aspects of waterfowl reoviruses (WRVs) affecting domestic duck and goose species. We outline the genetic diversity and evolution of circulating strains. The paper details the array of clinical signs and pathologies observed in infected birds. Most advanced laboratory diagnostic methods, including molecular techniques, are reviewed for their role in rapid and accurate detection, forming the cornerstone of effective surveillance programs. Furthermore, we explore the advancements in WRV vaccine development, covering traditional as well as promising novel approaches. The ongoing challenge of managing WRV infections necessitates integrated surveillance-control programs, prioritizing enhanced diagnostic capabilities and the development of more efficacious and broadly protective vaccines to safeguard populations of domestic ducks and geese.

Indexed as

disease monitoringduckgenome sequencinggenotypinggooseOrthoreovirusvaccine development

Identifiers

PMID41153981
PMCPMC12561871

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.