ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Computer Vision-Based Deep Learning Modeling for Salmon Part Segmentation and Defect Identification.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Objective Optimization Cutting Method for Irregularly Shaped Fish Fillets.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Image-Based Analysis of Morphometric Differences Between Sea-Caught and Farmed Large Yellow Croaker (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate cutting of salmon parts and surface defect detection are the key steps to enhance the added value of its processing. At present, mainstream manual inspection methods have low accuracy and efficiency, making it difficult to meet the demands of industrialized production. A machine vision inspection method based on a two-stage fusion network is proposed in this paper, aiming to achieve accurate cutting of salmon parts and efficient recognition of defects. The fish body image is collected by building a visual inspection system, and the dataset is constructed by preprocessing and data enhancement. For the part cutting, the improved U-Net model that introduces the CBAM attention mechanism is used to strengthen the extraction ability of the fish body texture features. For defect detection, the two-stage fusion architecture is designed to quickly locate the defective region by adding the YOLOv5 of the P2 small target detection layer first, and then the cropped region is fed into the improved U-Net for accurate cutting. The experimental results demonstrate that the improved U-Net achieves a mean average precision (mAP) of 96.87% and a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 94.33% in part cutting, representing improvements of 2.44% and 1.06%, respectively, over the base model. In defect detection, the fusion model attains an mAP of 94.28% with a processing speed of 7.30 fps, outperforming the single U-Net by 28.02% in accuracy and 236.4% in efficiency. This method provides a high-precision, high-efficiency solution for intelligent salmon processing, offering significant value for advancing automation in the aquatic product processing industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.