ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A New Method for Identification of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma Adulterated with Panacis Quinquefolii Radix.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the regulatory market, it is not uncommon for ginseng radix et rhizoma (GR) to be adulterated with panacis quinquefolii radix (PR). Amid the digital transformation, this study puts forward a new method for the identification of GR adulterated with PR. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS) was used to detect multiple batches of GR and PR to obtain mass spectrometry data. The common ions were isolated from multiple batches of GR and PR, serving as GR and PR's "ion matrices". Furthermore, GR and PR's "ion matrices" were used to eliminate intersecting ion data to extract the top-100 ions as GR and PR "matrix identity cards" (MICs). Then, GR and PR's MICs were employed as a reference for identification, yielding contrast credibility (CC) as feedback. The results indicated that leveraging the MICs of GR and PR enables efficient and precise digital identification of the two herbs: pure GR showed CC ≥ 95% when matched with GR MIC (≤2% with PR MIC), pure PR showed CC ≥ 93% with PR MIC (≤3% with GR MIC), and non-parametric analysis confirmed significant differences between groups (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.